Candidate should have passed with min. 50% marks in aggregate (45% in case of backward class candidates from Maharashtra State only) in any bachelor’s degree of minimum three years duration in any discipline recognized by association of Indian Universities. Selection Procedure: Candidate must have appeared for CET conducted by the DTE, MS and (for OMS Candidates any qualifying examination as CAT, XAT, MAT, ATMA, JMET) also for Group Discussion and Personal Interview conducted by a competent authority.

Anti ragging Act, Anti Ragging Procedure and Cell

The Maharashtra prohibition of ragging act. 1999. Act of Maharashtra legislature received the assent of the Governor on May 15, 1999 and was published in the Maharashtra Government Gazette, Extraordinary; part VIII, dated May 15, 1999.

S.3 Prohibition of Ragging: Ragging within or outside any educational institution is prohibited.

S.4 Penalty for ragging: Whoever directly indirectly commits, participates in, abets or propagates ragging within or outside any educational institution shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment for the term which may extend to two years and shall also be liable to a fine which may extend to ten thousand rupees.

S.5 Dismissal of student: Any student convicted of an offence under s.4 penalty for ragging shall be- dismissed from the educational institution and such student shall not be admitted in any other educational institution for a period of five years from the date of order of such dismissal.

S.6 Suspension of Student:

  • Whenever any student or, as the case may be, the parent or guardian, or teacher of an educational institution complaints, in writing, of ragging to the head of the educational institution, the head of that educational institution , shall, without prejudice of the foregoing provisions, within seven days of the receipt , of that the complaint and if, prima facie, it is found true, suspend the student who is accused of the offence, and shall, immediate forward the complaint to the police station having jurisdiction over the area in which the educational institution is situated, for further action.
  • Where, on inquiry by the head of the educational institution, it is proved that there is no substance, prima facie, in the complaint received under sub-section (1), he / she shall intimate the fact, in writing to the complainant.
  • The decision of the head of the educational institution that the student has indulged in ragging under sub section (1) shall be final.